Warning letter · Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

FDA warning letter 695156 to Prime Vitality, Inc. dba Prime Peptides

Issued December 10, 2024. The letter alleges that the peptide products offered from primepeptides.co are unapproved new drugs intended for human use, despite research-only labeling. It asks for a written response and it did not halt the business. The ledger record for Prime Peptides passes S8.

The letter, as filed

Every line below is copied from the letter itself. The addressee and the address are the ones the agency prints in the header, which is the pair an attribution rests on.

NumberMARCS-CMS 695156
IssuedDecember 10, 2024
AddresseePrime Vitality, Inc. dba Prime Peptides
Address735 State St., Ste 422, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
RecipientCurtis Miller, Named recipient
Issuing officeCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
SubjectUnapproved New Drugs/Misbranded
Website reviewedhttps://primepeptides.co, reviewed in October 2024
Sections cited201(g)(1), 201(p), 301(d), 505(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Close-out letterNone on the index when the close-out column was last read.

What it alleges

The peptide products offered from primepeptides.co are unapproved new drugs intended for human use, despite research-only labeling.

The letter quotes 2 claims from the website it reviewed, reproduced here exactly as the letter prints them, including the agency's own elisions.

Top Weight Loss Peptides: Semaglutide, Tirzepatide & More

not for human consumption or clinical use,

A quoted claim is evidence of what a page said when the agency read it. It is not evidence of what the page says today, and this site records the seller's current pages separately, on the seller record, with their own date.

The sections cited are 201(g)(1), 201(p), 301(d), 505(a). Section 505(a) prohibits introducing an unapproved new drug into interstate commerce and section 301(d) makes doing so a prohibited act. That is an unapproved-drug allegation rather than a labeling one.

How it was attributed

The letter reviews primepeptides.co by name and prints info@primepeptides.co. Its Santa Barbara street address is NOT the Santa Barbara address the site publishes today, and the record says so. A letter is filed under an operating entity, and a company may trade under names that appear nowhere in it, so the screen is run against the entity and the address rather than against the brand on the storefront. A name resemblance is never the test, because attaching one company's enforcement record to another is a worse error than missing a disclosure.

What the ledger records since

Prime Peptides is recorded against criterion S8, enforcement status as PASS. The basis reads: FDA warning letter 695156, December 2024, names Prime Vitality, Inc. doing business as Prime Peptides and alleges its peptide products are unapproved new drugs. No FDA action has halted the business, and the seller still trades. The storefront was reachable and trading when the record was last read.

The index carries no close-out letter for it. When the index was read in September 2026 it held 3,677 letters and 417 of them carried a close-out letter, so the column is populated and an empty cell is a reading rather than a gap. A letter that has been neither closed out nor followed by an action is the ordinary state of a warning letter.

Why this is not a disqualification

A warning letter identifies a concern, requests a response, and states that failure to address the violations may result in legal action, including seizure and injunction. Those actions are what criterion S8 fails on. The letter is the notice that precedes them and it is not one of them, so this ledger records it in full, dates it, links it, and leaves the seller listed and linked exactly as a seller with no letter.

1 other letter in this ledger carries the same issue date: 695663, to Swisschems.

Every letter in this ledger →

Sources

The letter was fetched from fda.gov and read in full on the date in the meta line above, in a run where every letter this ledger discloses returned a document and a fabricated letter address returned nothing, by the same method. This page ranks nothing, recommends nothing, and carries no partner link.