Warning letter · Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

FDA warning letter 721474 to Premium Health Management Inc. dba Premium Health

Issued February 20, 2026. The letter alleges that pictured labels identify Premium Health as the compounder of semaglutide and tirzepatide products when it is not, and claims of equivalence to the brand drugs, such as generic compounded medication and the active ingredient used in Ozempic and Wegovy, imply the compounded products have been FDA-approved when they have not. It asks for a written response and it did not halt the business. The ledger record for Premium Health passes S8.

The letter, as filed

Every line below is copied from the letter itself. The addressee and the address are the ones the agency prints in the header, which is the pair an attribution rests on.

NumberMARCS-CMS 721474
IssuedFebruary 20, 2026
AddresseePremium Health Management Inc. dba Premium Health
Address1800 E. Garry Ave. Suite 224, Santa Ana, CA 92705
Issuing officeCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)
SubjectFalse & Misleading Claims/Misbranded (Telehealth)
Website reviewedPremium Health's website, reviewed in December 2025
Sections cited502(a), 502(bb), 301(a), 301(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Close-out letterNone on the index when the close-out column was last read.

What it alleges

Pictured labels identify Premium Health as the compounder of semaglutide and tirzepatide products when it is not, and claims of equivalence to the brand drugs, such as generic compounded medication and the active ingredient used in Ozempic and Wegovy, imply the compounded products have been FDA-approved when they have not.

The letter quotes 3 claims from the website it reviewed, reproduced here exactly as the letter prints them, including the agency's own elisions.

“generic compounded medication”

“Semaglutide (the active ingredient used in Ozempic® and Wegovy®)”

“Tirzepatide (active ingredient used in Mounjaro®)”

A quoted claim is evidence of what a page said when the agency read it. It is not evidence of what the page says today, and this site records the seller's current pages separately, on the seller record, with their own date.

The sections cited are 502(a), 502(bb), 301(a), 301(c). Section 502(a) makes a drug misbranded where its labeling is false or misleading, and section 502(bb) extends that to the advertising or promotion of a compounded drug. Both are labeling and advertising provisions.

How it was attributed

The letter names Premium Health's website as the website it reviewed and gives a contact address at that domain, and its entity and Santa Ana street address are the ones the seller's privacy notice prints. A letter is filed under an operating entity, and a company may trade under names that appear nowhere in it, so the screen is run against the entity and the address rather than against the brand on the storefront. A name resemblance is never the test, because attaching one company's enforcement record to another is a worse error than missing a disclosure.

What the ledger records since

Premium Health is recorded against criterion S8, enforcement status as PASS. The basis reads: FDA warning letter 721474, February 2026, names Premium Health Management Inc. dba Premium Health at the Santa Ana, California address the privacy notice prints, alleging that pictured labels presented Premium Health as the compounder of its semaglutide and tirzepatide and that claims such as generic compounded medication and the active ingredient used in the brand drugs implied FDA approval. No close-out letter appears in the index. No FDA action has halted the business, and the seller still trades. The storefront was trading as of the date on its record.

The index carries no close-out letter for it. As of September 2026 the index held 3,677 letters and 417 of them carried a close-out letter, so the column is populated and an empty cell is a reading rather than a gap. A letter that has been neither closed out nor followed by an action is the ordinary state of a warning letter.

Why this is not a disqualification

A warning letter identifies a concern, requests a response, and states that failure to address the violations may result in legal action, including seizure and injunction. Those actions are what criterion S8 fails on. The letter is the notice that precedes them and it is not one of them, so this ledger records it in full, dates it, links it, and leaves the seller listed and linked exactly as a seller with no letter.

19 other letters in this ledger carry the same issue date: 717985, to Zeuss LLC dba Zeuss, 717987, to FitRX, LLC dba FitRx, 717989, to Lean Rx, Inc. dba SkinnyRx, 717991, to Kare Solutions, LLC dba Zappy, 721448, to Strut Health, LLC dba Strut, 721449, to Good Girl LLC dba GoodGirlRX, 721450, to Kin Meds, 721451, to Genesis Health International Inc. dba Genesis, 721453, to MaxLife Technologies Inc. dba Maxlife, 721454, to Better Health Labs, Inc. dba Measured, 721455, to MEDVi, LLC dba MEDVi, 721472, to NewSelf Limited dba NewSelf, 721475, to Refills Health, LLC dba Refills Health, 721478, to Weightless Medical LLC dba WeightCare, 721479, to Bliv Wellness LLC dba Bliv, 721481, to Aspen Aesthetics dba Fifty 410, 721795, to Belle Health LLC dba Belle, 721814, to Alan Health Technologies Inc. dba Alan, 721816, to Ivim Services LLC dba Ivim.

Every letter in this ledger →

Sources

The letter is quoted from its own page on fda.gov, as it stood on the date in the meta line above. This page ranks nothing, recommends nothing, and carries no partner link.